Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnH
Ken,
I am still not sure which is better, autoguiding is fast/accurate but can include seeing errors if the rate is fast...and it needs to be otherwise your corrections are offset by the sample rate, you can fix this if you use PEMPro or have a Losmandy Gemini (and I don't) so what to do for the best I wonder. Star of med brightness on the ecliptic is part of it but best sample rate is .1 to 1s according to some sources but would not this run the risk of chasing the seeing? Could a pec train be done on an artificial star?
|
I run Guidedog a 2 seconds anyway, so 'seeing' errors would be minimalised.
As far as an artificial star goes, how would you get an artificial star to track at exact siderial speed. Sounds like a no go.