View Single Post
  #8  
Old 03-05-2007, 11:14 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
I put the proposition recently that a black hole in my view could not influence a galaxy given its relative size to the galaxy.
Not all galaxies have central black holes. In fact, two galaxies (albiet small and irregular satellite galaxies) that you would have observed countless times don't have central black holes - the small and the large magellanic clouds.

Also, for galaxies that do have central black holes - they do influence the galaxy. They are observed by looking at the rotation of the stars around the galaxy core - put simply, the stars rotate faster due to the gravitational influence of the black hole. By this simple definition, black holes influence galaxies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Why are black holes no larger than 100 million solar masses.. It seems they have run out of food!
Perhaps they are just too young? Ask this question again in 150 billion years and they might be bigger although I suspect that some scientist somewhere will be able to come up with a theory that suggests in the first 100 thousand years of the universe age some sort of thing happened whereby the density of the universe was decreasing at a specific rate due to the universes expansion which put an upper limit on these things (just as we could also put an upper limit on galaxy size - we don't see galaxies with 4 trillion stars for example)
Reply With Quote