All right rich i will let you of this time
at least this thread got some brain juices flowing for without everyones thoughts ,comments and critisism we would all stagnat .
At least this way most of us learn something..well i hope we do!!!!Anyway thanks to everyone for their comments ,all are appreciated
Quote:
Originally Posted by richardo
Hey Jase,
interesting ratio's on your Custom Scientific filters... I'm sure Rob will have a bit more of a mess..
I actually did increase things in the R & B end to almost around those figures at one stage and dropped the green down to .8, was really weird colour to the core stars... very red as compared to what I get with my 10" reflector - Astronomiks and HX9.... at around R:1.1, G:.882, B 1.185...
Even my ED 80 was similar/ close to the above..
I think Rob will have to either get a g2V down or have some serious fun messing....
I found his Tarantula was far easier to process, weights at around R:1 G:.95 & B:1..... it showed good colour with no trace of green... although Rob did process and publish his version, so I have no idea of what he weighted things.
That's why I was thinking with this image of the Omega, the gradient affected things across the fOV.
Still that's for Rob to sort out.
Thanks for the interesting comparison between the Astronomiks and the Custom Scientifics.
All the best
Rich
p.s.
Sorry for hi jacking your thread here Rob....!!! ah.... over to you..
 |