Quote:
Originally Posted by ballaratdragons
.........BUT, what was the Trans, Seeing, etc like in each one. Can't really compare without having matching observing conditions....
|
That is where I was headed. Though I have no direct experience, I would expect that different transparencies and seeing conditions would be important to image quality. Secondly, I reckon that even a small difference in the incident sunlight angle could lead to big differences in definition of the surface objects. From the shadows in the craters, the incident sunlight angle seemed somewhat different between the two images.
ps. I voted for the 350D image. However, I could happily cope with both framed on my wall
.