|
Ron you said
"I would not say that in this sense I radiate energy that could travel beyond my immediate locality and I would not think my presence would exert pressure on anything other than my shoes".
Now Ron I find that hard to believe of course but I was referring to bodies such as stars, not that you are not a star in your own right but the ones like our Sun.
I believe if you adopt the notion og gravity rain the need for dark matter disappears. Dark matter is a myth. Dark energy is not.
You also said
"I don't buy this, gravity from our planets perspective is clearly understood, so much in fact that we can re-create it and sell it off to wealthy tourists. When you leave our atmosphere and go into space, our humans that float around in say the ISS do not have an upwards force or inwards force from the actual space station which weights vastly more than the human, which in your model should be forced and jammed clearly in the centre of the space station hemmed in on all sides by opposing forces.
Dont go by their ads there is no 5 star rating for space hotels yet.
Gravity rain holds us suspecded in space, so we appear weightless and uneffected by gravity. The point is we are at that point suspended on "all sides" by the force.. The shielding of the space hotel walls (hotel walls are always thin) is insignificant but I imagine if you had walls made of lead and 50 meters thick you would notice their effect... but still only a minimal effect...
And you said...
"I need more time to think about this, I have no comment at this stage. Can you give a far more detailed explanation of what you mean?"
Yes I can. In fact I wrote something here sometime ago and hopefully my ideas have not changed such that it is not a fair representation of my current ideas.
I will have a look for the post and provide a link. But simply put.. space will be found to be "sticky" because of the "pushing" arrangement... pushing is not exactly what is going on... GR losses energy when it encounters mass so on side of the gr supply has greater pressure.
However if it is the way I say they will slow and stop and speed up... they can not respond this way in a Universe where attraction exists.. they are slowing at the moment needless to say I see this as the start of my prediction being correct...so I hope it is the start of my prediction.
I believe "they" now say it is dark energy that is the cause of the craft slowing up,.. many would have thought that in open space the craft would "take off" but that is only if you see space as empty, I dont cause its full of gravity rain.. well thats what I have said from the start and the craft will get stuck firstly then be carried quickley away from us...
GR is maybe a better defined dark energy... If you see it works this way you do not need "matter" in the current context, to create the gravity they seek to attribute to dark matter..there is none... there needs to be none because although mass is relevant in gravity it is not relevant to generate dark energy..dark energy is generated simply from "all the star light" as it were.. even your energy generated contributes a little to the pressure.
And Ron lastly you said...
"No because I have not disagreed does not infer that I more or less agree, it simply means I have not disagreed before. Like you I am open to input on a continual basis, and should I be shown I am in error in one part or all of what I say then I will immediately acknowledge it and add the new learning into my heap, which continues to grow every single day. My fondest wish, like you, is to be shown categorically that I am wrong, this is the only way that I will evolve and grow, this trial and error and testing and observing results is science and like you, is the tenant by which I abide."
It is a compliment that you read what I have written Ron, there has not been a time where I have laid a trap hidden in verbosity that you have not easily seen.
I will look more closely at your Universe later ...
And finally you said.........
"I explained above that there is no actual bending per se, bending implies a rigidness at some point that no longer remains rigid i.e. bends, this is a nonsense, space-time flows bubbling along by existence, and all that goes to make existence up"
Space time is the human "description" of space in a geometry format. When talking of space time I think of it like a 3 dimentional graph, the graph representing different "conditions" for the purposes of space time discussion but in my Universe say it is the gr that is responsible for the different "conditions" ..Space time is the theory and observation GR is the machinery of the opperation.
However when I talk of space time it is in the context of the "graph" the current popular description generates.
alex
|