Quote:
Originally Posted by janoskiss
Agree with Phil the 5mm will have little or no use. If it was me I'd ditch the 5mm and be looking at getting something at 300x and 400x to give better selection at the high power end. Also a 20mm T5 for general purpose deep sky. The 16mm is probably just a little too much power for many faint fuzzies, esp galaxies, IMO.
|
Hi,
In this case i agree with Janokiss. On an outstanding night, maybe once a year if i am lucky my scope should reach 60 per inch of aperture. So the 5mm radian in this case would be ideal for planetary views (although the barlowed 11mm is much the same).
Still I may get another scope. I used to have some vixens and they lasted for years. Maybe since i already have the radian i may keep it if i get a slower scope.