View Single Post
  #10  
Old 09-04-2007, 04:28 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidpretorius View Post
if your best 50 frames are creating very nice images, then you may want to cut it off like you say to less images.

if you move the slider back and forth after the initial alignment and quality sort, you can get a good ideas where the images start to go wayward.

limit the number of images there and then further reduce at the stacking stage.

obviously less images to play with means less wavelets for worse seeing, but well worth the testing.
Yep. That's exactly what I do, Davo.

I take the best 90% from the first run, and then cull it down even further at Stacking.

But I think the secret is to stack that fewer number of frames when (as you say) the seeing is very nice.

I'm going to go with something between 100 and 200 for a while and see what happens.

Obviously, it will depend on the seeing.

Thanks, mate
Reply With Quote