|
Good discussion.
I think the differences are typical of LR deconvolution (Mike's reprocess) versus ME Deconvolution (mine). I prefer generally to use ME Deconvolution on my Jupiter images as I end up with a less grainy looking image. As well, my image has had some mild noise reduction applied to it which has enhanced this variation.
As Graeme has said sometimes it is all about asthetics vs scientific data. I can add to this also by saying that I think that eventually everyone develops some type of their own "style".
However can I just say that if it wasn't largely to Mike running IIS and the fantastic information sharing that goes on the IIS forumns I doubt I would be posting any images that were worthwhile discussing!
Clear skies and good seeing to everyone.
|