View Single Post
  #12  
Old 24-02-2007, 10:14 PM
skies2clear
Registered User

skies2clear is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 238
Thanks everyone so far for your valuable input. It seems the Orion is slightly less expensive than the Celestron, if you get the Celestron discounted (about $140).

I just had a chance to look thru one and it seemed to work well, but I have nothing great (barlow) to compare it with, except comparing a 14mm XW with 2X barlow against a 7mm XW with no barlow. The losses seemed small, but I didn't have a really great night/ seeing conditions to be conclusive. However at F5, the 14XW barlowed, was sharper at the edge of field than it normally is. No surprise there really.

I'm interested in using a barlow on those rare nights for planetary use, and thought the better the barlow, the less it gets in the way of the final image.

I had a chance some time ago to get an old TV 1.8X barlow for a good price. Should have tried it!

When I can be more conclusive about the comparison, I'll give my 2 cents worth,

Clear skies
Reply With Quote