Thread: DMK Confusion
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 09-02-2007, 06:58 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I can understand your point-of-view (and am jealous of those 5 cameras, especially the large format ones!), however I still believe mono is the way to go if you want to get serious.

We're not only talking about the loss of resolution due to the bayer matrix. The mono + filters also allows:
1) Refocus at each colour channel. I can tell you from experience that each channel has a different focus point. It's minor, but it's noticeable and makes a huge difference to the final result.
2) Adjust settings at each colour channel, mainly gain - so you can end up with a properly adjusted histogram at each colour channel which ensures full dynamic range across the image.

Not to mention processing - even when I was capturing colour avi's (with a ToUcam), I still split the avi into separate colour channels and processed them independantly. It gave me far better results than processing as a colour avi.

So mono+filters forces you to do this. A colour DFK could still be processed independantly by splitting them, so you may as well get the extra benefits as posted above and get a mono+filters.

Yes it's more time, more work, more cost - but we're talking about serious hi-res planetary imaging. If you're just a casual webcam imager, then I'd agree completely about going with the colour camera.
Reply With Quote