View Single Post
  #3  
Old 30-01-2007, 02:03 PM
TidaLpHasE's Avatar
TidaLpHasE
Gone fish'n

TidaLpHasE is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 668
Hello Jim, I had a 350d for a while before it took a swim in the ocean, the camera performed great on almost everything i targeted.

I now have a 400d and find it even better, higher resoution, that wouldnt make much of a difference but helps in larger print size, i heard by only an inch or two, 350d, 3456 x 2304, and the 400d 3888 x 2592 Max resolution.

Sensor cleaner, a good idea, and also the dust removal software, for those stubborn motes, you basically take a pic of a flat white wall, or screen and the camera records it and uses it to remove the dust from the image through the software, i haven't tried it yet, but it seems like a great idea, saves you from trying to clone out dust on a decent pic.

If you had a 350d, it wouldn't really be worth upgrading to the 400d, in my opinion, but i would buy the 400d in a flash over the 350d if i was looking at purchasing a dig-cam.

Regarding noise, have a look around the net at comparisons, both cameras are almost equal in high iso noise results, at least from the tests i have seen, as far as lower sensitivity, i am not too sure, i will dig out some pics taken from my backyard wth the 350d and match the settings and take the same image with the 400d.

Hope this has helped.

Cheers

Trevor.
Reply With Quote