I sometimes work on what I call the universal theory of trade and existence, where humans over the entire surface of the earth have free access to all the goods and resources; money is no longer the motivating force and the pursuit of knowledge is most important. Trouble with this theory is that those who have the most to gain at present have the ability to affect the minds of the ignorant. For the system to work we as humans need a radical change in our outlook, and those who benefit from the current system have to be eliminated from the equation. Now this might sound like the Marx Engles system, but it is not the same. I studied Marx and Engles at Uni, this is another system which has some similarities to Marxism, however is fundementally different in that there is still a heirarchy. That heirarchy is awarded on the basis of wisdom not monetary strength. The system is much more complex than this and would require several hundred pages to be fully exposed.
Aside from that, my sister is doing her fellowship at Stamford Uni in California on cancer research. Her doctorate was on mael cell development (skin pigment cells) and how the skin on your backside (due to it not getting any or much sun exposure) determines whether you get skin cancer. She hopes that one day she will be able to engineer a cell to eat cancer cells (she can already do this) and then for those very same cells to turn off once it can find no more cancerous cells ( this cannot do at present). It is actually more complicated than this, most of which I don't understand, but that is the jist. She has a higher IQ than I do and able to grasp much more complex things than I can. I am not that smart I was only able to get a bachelor of laws and a post graduate in laws at Uni. She is infinitely more equipped with a mind capable of much more understanding.
Paul
|