Quote:
Originally Posted by ariane
Put simply, Intelligent Design (ID) cannot be a theory, because it has no real physical or observable evidence to prove its case - either for or against.
|
actually it is the lack of physical evidence that makes both ID and evolution theories. neither of them have enough eveidence in my mind to call them fact.
Theories: lets take for example the term conspiracy theory. one might say 'theres a strange turn of events, someone must be behind it' and theres your conspiracy theory. theres no real evidence exept for the fact that an event happened and didnt happen by its self... now some paperwork is found regarding the planning of said event, so it is no longer a theory but a
fact but if there is no name attached one might form thoeries on
who might be behind it.
so being that in both ID and evolution there are no hard cold facts but huge holes they are both theories, yes?
