A long time ago, I read that the generic term of SD stood for "Special Dispersion" and in that context, it was a poor man's ED and a very, very poor man's fluorite.
So, the "quality" line appeared to go something like Achromat -> SD -> ED -> Fluorite.
I'm not sure if SD was a marketing ploy to give the consumer a warm feeling that he/she was getting something better than an achromat and closer to ED?
Cheers
Dennis
EDIT:
I might just add that this was from reading UK photography magazines in the early 1990’s. It seems that Televue places SD as you have written, closer to Fluorite.
Last edited by Dennis; 04-01-2007 at 12:44 PM.
|