View Single Post
  #10  
Old 01-01-2007, 09:21 AM
CoombellKid
Registered User

CoombellKid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argonavis View Post
I think we need a counter-revolution and insist that the Hartung numbers be quoted for all deep sky objects when referring to them.
I'm not sure that Hartung actually attached numbers/letters as in to create
a new catalogue of deepsky objects. The numbers in his book are only
reference numbers that, I suspect were given to them for reference purposes
for the book

But I could be wrong, I have never ever heard anyone refer to an object
by it's Hartung# or call Omega Centuri/Hartung 591. these reference numbers
do not correspond between both books, the second edition has a couple of
hundred objects added during the rewrite by David Malin and David Frew.

Apart from the C argument, I like my copy of Caldwell objects and often
refer to it.

regards,CS sunny days

Last edited by CoombellKid; 01-01-2007 at 09:34 AM.
Reply With Quote