Quote:
Originally Posted by gbeal
I have the 70-200 f4L non IS, and wouldn't part with it. I toyed with the idea of the f2.8, but at the cost and weight opted for the f4, and have not looked back. For astro use it is amazing, and all I need now is the tripod collar which unfortunately Canon see fit to not include. A wonderful companion lens is the 17-40 f4 L.
|
Garry,
I couldn't agree more - I wouldn't buy the F/2.8 because of the size and weight also. But F/4 image stabalised, now there's something I'd buy. The lense is physically the same size as the non-IS, the only down-side is cost it seems.
Roger.