View Single Post
  #14  
Old 05-04-2005, 09:30 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Vermin,

I will attempt to answer this for Gary as I know he is going away and may not be available to answer for 10 days or so.

You need to square the resolution of the encoders because they work in 2 axis.

The encoders have 8,192 steps in each axis, which when matrixed gives you 8,192 x 8192 = 67,108,864 possible permutations. The 10,000 step encoders give you 10,000x10,000 = 100,000,000 possible permutations. Therefore the 10,000 step encoders give you an extra 32,891,136 permutations over the 8,192 step encoders permutations of 67,108,864.

The % increase in total resolution is 32,891,136/67,108,864
or an increase of 49.01 %

I think I went pretty close to collecting the chocolates

CS-John B
Reply With Quote