|
I will stick my neck out...the Big Bang theory makes no sence to me, yet to raise such a point of view draws responces that makes one feel stupid for thinking such. Well I feel the big bang was dead in the water until inflation came along to save it.. as I said I simply can not accept (inflation) such would have or could have taken place. The only proposition to support the logic is that without inflation each part of the Universe could not know the other.. as if rules of physics will be different if we can not find a point in common at one point..fair enough but that is not the only way. I get the distinct impression that politics has a great bearing on what may be acceptable which is unfortunate as we are really seeking to see into the past with tools that can only be inadequate irrespective of how sophisticated we believe them to be.
I am all for different and competing views for within that environment possibilities can be entertained. Holding firmly to the Big Bang causes one to only see certain possibilities. I prefer the steady state theory because that is the only way I can entertain that God exsists.. whereas the Big Bang to me supports only religion.
Well its early and I am still half asleep but my purpose was to comment on the exclusion of other possibilities as if any mention of them was to demonstarte one was uninformed and uneducated in what "they" know.
|