View Single Post
  #10  
Old 11-07-2025, 11:39 PM
Don Pensack's Avatar
Don Pensack
Registered User

Don Pensack is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by mental4astro View Post
Well, what do you think will happen with an f/5 achro?

Regardless of the eyepiece that scope has a large amount of field curvature that all eyepieces will struggle with. Increase the AFOV & field curvature will become more apparent too.

I have used this eyepiece (different flavour but same design - same eyepiece is sold under many brands including Celestron, APM, Sky Rover & others) in an f/5 achro. Beautiful image but the edge of the FOV shows some field curvature. Not the fault of the eyepiece but because design of the scope. No free lunch here. In a better corrected scope the eyepiece performance increases too. It's one of my favourite eyepieces.

This eyepiece will not show a wider amount of sky than your 32mm plossl. It will actually show a little less. What it will have is a larger AFOV than your plossl. A 1.25" 32mm plossl will show as much of the sky as the 1.25" barrel size will allow. A 1.25" 40mm plossl will show no more of the sky than your plossl, but in a smaller AFOV. If you want more actual sky you need to move on to 2" eyepieces, whether your scope allows for these is another matter.
The 24mm Ultra Flat Field has had its field stop measured to be 27.6mm, whereas the 32mm Plössls out there max out at a 27.0mm field stop, so the 24mm UFF will show a trace larger true field, and at a higher magnification as well.
But, if field curvature is a problem in the 32mm Plössl, it will be worse in the 24mm UFF because the wider the field stop, the more visible FC will be.
Reply With Quote