Hi Steve
Gulp – 4 sounds really bad.
From memory, when I performed an @Focus automated focusing run in The Sky X Pro, it reported a FWHM of around 2 which was surprisingly good given the ferocious jet stream overhead.
Cheers
Dennis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinderboxsky
Your C9.25 and no doubt some good seeing, has delivered resolution that I am very envious of. I just don’t have the seeing conditions to get this level of resolution in images I have tried on close doubles - 4 arc seconds is about my limit.
I have observed Antares’ companion, visually, on several occasions.
|