Thanks Martin, and good on you for taking a documentary mindset to the presentation of your images.
However I don't think Ivo Jager has provided a fair representation of what BlurX is doing "under the hood" and (because BlurX is still at its heart a deconvolution algorithm, as described in detail here
https://www.rc-astro.com/the-mathema...urxterminator/) I reject the suggestion that one inherently cannot produce a faithful image if BlurX is employed