Quote:
Originally Posted by astronobob
Pretty cool going Allan, yeah they have adaptable lenses for phones, maybe they create a reverse macro job and then they will 'Match' the Dlsr,
I still doubt any phone image could be printed nicely to fit on the side of a bus or a huge quality print in reality, but as far as the Screen world goes, difficult to tell the difference on the surface, ,
However, the flowers, yeah the phone looks more vibrant initially but after a normal quality check, I see the sharpening edge effects, also easily see that Fine Blotchiness that ph photos have,,
Ph chip pixels are very small lending a hand to obvious details and must add the Dslr Kit Lens is likened to the last out the blocks for any race,
That said I not favouring either, each with own advantages, in fact I am using my ph more and more for standard captures speshly with the super wide fields and panorama abilities, as mentioned 'all fits in ones pocket,,  |
Thanks Bob,
The DSLR is not sharp because the Kit lens is of poor quality.
Thats all you get with the DSLR camera you have to buy a good lens for big dollars if you want more.
It seems that the mobile phone only really wins from convenience
you just have it with you not in a cupboard at home.
The evolution of technology is amazing
now every Tom, Dick and Harry can take reasonable Macro shots that
years ago only someone with a DSLR could take.
BTW - there was no sharpening or any processing done to either image.
cheers
Allan