Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryderscope
Good on you Mike presenting us with a fine galaxy image from the new camera. Your results definitely show the benefit of moving to the smaller pixel camera. We are excited as to what awaits us  |
Nice to hear, thanks Roddles
Can only imagine the improvement, were my scope to have
no astigmatism...?
I suspect the true FWHM is probably hitting nearer 1.2"-1.3" on many nights up here, so an aberration free, good size aperture operating at say, around 0.4"/pix (?), would be quite an amazing performer on those nights.
Mike