|
There is one aspect to this discussion that seems to be missing and which plays into the strategic direction that IIS is, or should be, heading. Firstly let me say that it would be tragic to see IIS fold. I read the latest posts every day and have used the classifieds on many occasions. We should do whatever we can to keep this going but let’s have a look at what this means.
What strikes me is the currency of the site generally and exactly what format and structure IIS should adopt in the future. Whilst the forums and the classifieds are very active, the rest of the site is not.
If a new or prospective user/member enters the IIS web site via the home page, they will see articles and resources and other items which are at least 10 years old at best and very much out of date. This first impression would deter many from going forward as they would not realise how active and valuable the forums are. It is quite apparent that when IIS first started the resources, articles and equipment reviews were contributed by members on a regular basis but this is no longer the case. The equivalent sections on Cloudy Nights are quite active (acknowledging the fact that they have a much larger market).
So from a strategic direction viewpoint, IIS needs to consider exactly what format it is going to adopt. My thoughts are that we may need to just do away with the non forum based content and re image IIS as a specific forum based entity which, along with the classified ads, is where we all go to on a regular basis.
Mike has done a fantastic job in starting IIS and we owe him many many thanks for creating this fantastic resource. I fully support his current position and that we need to look at different options going forward.
In terms of options and to throw my hat into the ring here, I agree with one observation that the Discord platform is not suitable as a replacement for IIS. It lacks the specific structured threads that are very useful for tracking particular issues. I haven’t researched other options and don’t have the skills to recommend a particular technology. If it would be possible then maybe the current site could be reconfigured into a specific forum structure only, whilst retaining all existing forum based content.
I note one observation regarding content on mobile devices. This is an important issue that may be critical for newer members but does also come with an increased level of complexity.
So in summary and apologies for long post, not only do we need to look at funding the site, we must look at the objectives of IIS and the most appropriate format and structure to suit the needs of our members.
Clear skies,
Rodney
|