View Single Post
  #9  
Old 05-09-2024, 05:41 PM
OzEclipse's Avatar
OzEclipse (Joe Cali)
Registered User

OzEclipse is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: '34 South' Young Hilltops LGA, Australia
Posts: 1,481
Yes, providing the threaded rod is accurately curved, it should track just a tiny bit slower than the King rate. (15.041 "/s).

Your device:

Tracking displacement angle per min = ATAN {Pitch(mm) / [Radius(mm) x 60] }

Tracking rate of your device in arc sec per second = 206265 * ATAN{ (25.4÷24) ÷ (242*60) } = 15.034 "/s

So assuming a perfectly accurate construction and perfect 1rpm drive rate, you'll accumulate 0.007 "/s lag error. This accumulates to about 2" in a 5 min exposure + any construction & motor error.

Note: It's impossible to build these things perfectly accurately.
For example, if the radius is 243mm instead of 242, then the drive error is 10x bigger 0.07"/s or 21 arc sec over a 5 min exposure.

21 arc sec over 5 mins corresponds to approximately 1.5 pixel drift using a 50mm lens and 8 pixels drift with a 300mm lens.

If the tracker is accurately built, then the drive error is about 1 pixel in 5 mins with a 300mm lens.

I'll look forward to see your results.

Good luck!

Joe
Reply With Quote