View Single Post
  #10  
Old 07-08-2024, 12:21 PM
Leo.G (Leo)
Registered User

Leo.G is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,619
Silly question, should I be up, and my equipment not be frozen solid in my back room, what combination of scope/lens would be best to capture this (clear skies permitting)?
I can use my Nikon with a 300mm f4.5 lens and a 2 times teleconvertor with a simple tripod from anywhere in my back yard or I could go to the bother of setting up my mount with a scope but the set up wouldn't be the most accurate and I wouldn't have time to get correct alignment (unless I sleep out in the yard with my equipment in sub zero temperatures).


Then I have the issue of a big hole I dug where my mount goes with the intention of putting my pier in but a combination of weather, health and personal problems have pushed that back considerably and I don't like setting my mount up over a hole full of water. There's no way humanly possible for me to get it done within the next week, I have bigger problems.


Is a 600mm focal length suitable to capture a reasonable image with a full frame sensor (I could go back to my old Nikon D80 APS-C camera)?


I also have a combination of same 300mm lens (f4.5) with an old 1.5 times Olympus ED extension lens from an old Olympus IS1000 film camera which apparently won't require the standard 2 stop speed reduction and a suitable adapter to fit to give a focal length of 450mm.
Or an f2.8 80-200 Nikon ED lens with same 2 times teleconvertor. That gives me a faster image. I don't have an adapter to use the old Olympus glass on the 200mm lens.


I'm guessing whichever combination would only give me small dots in the sky and nothing overly good?
Reply With Quote