|
I'd agree with that, Dennis.. MAP seems to be best suited to the nights where you have a boundary layer and/or average seeing where you gets "waves" of fluctuation across the image, where some of the image is sharp while other parts are blurry. MAP processing will combine the sharp parts of each frame so that the final result is sharp.
When the seeing is very good and the image is stable across the field already, then MAP processing won't help much if it all.
|