View Single Post
  #7  
Old 19-08-2023, 10:23 AM
ChrisD's Avatar
ChrisD (Chris)
Image, Stack, Repeat.

ChrisD is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonius View Post
Blows my mind that you can do this.

So is that a detection threshold of 0.02 magnitudes you're working with there?

Also did you use the de-focus method, or did you buy one of those special diffuser filters?

Markus
Great questions, Markus.

The transit depth from the ephemeris is 15.05 ppt, which is around 16 milli-mag, approximately 0.016 mag. The star has a magnitude of 11.5. While NASA calculated the transit flux depth at 1.5%, my results indicate a closer to 2% drop in flux.

I did not use a diffuser. The C8/Starizona corrector/IMX571 combination leads to significant oversampling, resulting in a good spread of photons from the star across the pixels. I supplemented this with a slight defocus, extending to about 5.0 HFD. The imaging session lasted about 3.5 hours, during which I allowed the C8 focus to drift (as they tend to), and the session concluded at around 6.5 HFD. This did not pose any issues during processing.

Chris

Last edited by ChrisD; 19-08-2023 at 10:37 AM.
Reply With Quote