View Single Post
  #12  
Old 07-08-2023, 02:12 PM
foc (Ross)
Registered User

foc is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: ACT
Posts: 258
I would not push the AM5 too far, it is not such a cheap item as that!
I have used my AM5 with smallish triplet refractors in the 102mm area, a 140mm triplet and I have done a little imaging with the C11. Had no issues with the refractors. Had a test run on Saturn with the C11 at f10 plate solving limited a bit by the moon. My XL C11 being fitted with a lomandy dovetail up top and a light guidescope weighing in still around 15kg, not counting the counterweight.

Then as I tried for f15 with a planetary cam, I had slippage a few nights ago even with a 5kg counterweight after a meridian flip. I heard high pitched whining and reversal of the drive with the scope being headbutted into the tripod leg and I could not get the scope to a horizonal level using the controls of either on the ASIAIR or the mount software without it again reversing into the mount. At the time I had the counterweight high up on the shiny low friction pole ZWO sells for the AM5. I reported the incident to TESTAR and they just assured me it was likely a balance issue. I guess that time will tell and I am going to keep the counterweight at the far end and see if that avoids such issues.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Sat manual aps 2023-08-02-1432_4-L-ZWO ASI2600MC Pro_Gain=267_Exposure=33.png)
117.3 KB90 views
Reply With Quote