View Single Post
  #6  
Old 10-06-2023, 07:41 AM
ronson
Registered User

ronson is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: ACT, Australia
Posts: 169
Hi Matt,

Could it be this one: https://www.google.com.au/search?q=W...UTF-8&hl=en-au

Seems the name is P-FLAT68, but on some photos looks different. Maybe the cone shaped part is added separately?

As per https://www.astroshop.eu/field-flatt...-series/p,5034, Lens-to-chip suggested distance: 68mm.

But then, there is this link https://www.opticsplanet.com/william...e-flat-68.html to this diagram suggesting what it looks like different distance: https://op2.0ps.us/static/lib/supple...ChiptoLens.gif, 46.45mm with the cone adapter, else total distance 113.13mm.

Confusing…

Another link I found, http://www.astro-photography.net/FLT...e-problem.html, but seems this person doesn’t use the cone adapter, so he had to add distance to get it it to the recommended total distance of 113.13mm

Might be a matter of playing with the distances and see if any of them works.
Reply With Quote