|
Hi Peter.
Please tell me that it is modestly reliable...I get the feeling that it may be lacking but also that it is a good introduction ..certainly there are plenty of references to additional material...I can not see what there is notv to like.... I like the way it covers people..their background and if they hold conspiracy views, anti climate change views, or are anti vax mad, ,,,one chap that someone told me was a great economist turned out to have defrauded investors 700 million and served 11 years jail..he does not get a second chance with me so I dont think he was a good economist..and wiki alerted me that he went to jail...now folk like him don't have a good word to say about WIKI and I suspect that I know why..but if wiki reported that incorrectly they could be successfully sued so one must assume they have got it correct.
Perhaps Peter you may care to suggest a better encyclopedia that you think would suit me..ones with lots of photos..
In hope you are going Well.
Alex
|