Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscoDuck
I am/was reticent too re BlurX but, as long as it is just used for decon (for which it was trained) I think it seems honest and above board. But happy for the community to go the other way and I will switch back to Lucy-Richardson for decon - and welcome back the wiggly worms into my images  |
I agree. Looking at some images on the interweb, people seem to use it turned up to 11 at almost any stage in processing, but when it's used subtly as a deconvolution tool, it works very well.