Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal
I think it needs to be done with caution so that details
that aren't there at all are portrayed -
sharpening artifacts -
just like the sharpening worms that we all hate so much.
cheers
Allan
|
Definitely agreed, Allan, to use with care. And also I think only use it for the deconvolution step - it is not meant to be a general sharpening tool afaik.
It does, for deconvolution, seem much less prone to wiggly worms than algorithms like Richardson-Lucy though, so you can push it a bit further than classical decon.