Quote:
Originally Posted by oska
On the haters, sure. The reasoned opinions of scientists, not so much 
Keep in mind ChatGPT passing exams is a parlour trick. The structure and nature of the training data (vast quantity of previous exams and their Q/A format) plays into the strengths of machine learning (fancy pattern matcher) implying a general knowledge that is only relevant to human learning. And this parlour trick is computationally expensive to execute and vastly more to create.
Anytime these systems have been given access to "everything" they go off the rails almost immediately. And that is kinda interesting itself given the way that parallels eerily to certain tribal groups. |
Why should a scientist have an opinion that wecshould think is relevant?
Opinions are belief based if they have something to say produce a paper...
My observation simply is a lot of effort has gone into this, ever what we see now is rather wonderful and sure there will be areas that can be better but I object to the general negative responce. Same with " smart" cars ... very few step up and say well aren't they clever and won't this be wonderful down the track...
I am not a grizzler and frankly I have plenty I could grizzle about but I always look for the bright side and appreciate everything... So I guess I am grizzling about grizzlers so I will shut up and go back to ignoring all negativity I find in the world...but it plain sucks.
Alex