Quote:
Originally Posted by oska
It's the hype and alternative facts being objected to. Just to be clear many of the "critics" are the people at the forefront of the very advances being discussed, the scientists that developed much of it. And all they're saying is calm down, the hype merchants are way over the top this time, even for hype merchants.
This will probably give us better natural language search engines and simple support chat bots but further than that remains to be seen for many reasons. I don't think we should be calling these techniques AI because it's demonstrably not "AI", according to the scientists, but the facebook/twitter news cycle has already won that one.
|
Well there you have it ...the problem identified, well therefore why does not all this talk attack the hype merchants rather than the subject of their hype.
Seems very simple to me.
If these folk have any sense why can't they articulate what you have presented.
Why not say that the hype merchants have the brain of a pigeon ...
If there is a problem with the name why not change it rather than employ a derogatory attack... I still say the pigeon guy is interested in self promotion nothing more.
AND scientists are there to produce scientific papers not casual opinions.
Alex