Sort of my meaning exactly about the limitations, at any sort of level you would look at those ideas and decide that they were going to be either impracticable (Drones and balloons) or actually so sensible that they are already done (IR photography anyone?) but it is the kind of "Hey, wouldn't it be cool if we could" thought bubbles that would get pulled out of the mass of training data acquired by more or less backing up the internet.
The third (Augmented reality) is sort of cool, but shows that it just associates, not understands. If you understood the question (Demonstrate "lateral thinking" to develop an innovative means of capturing astrophotography) you would not answer with using AR to display it.
|