Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Good result.
These sample images though have had a stretch done?
That makes it nonlinear data and therefore not ideal for blurrxterminator which requires linear data like Startools does.
So if that is the case then you would expect better results if applied to the data before any curves are applied.
Greg
|
Greg,
When I get time I might show some comparisons using the Startools Spatially Variant PSF Deconvolution which came out early last year in version 1.8
Ivo is currently working on version 1.9 which is supposed to be even better , more intuitive and less sampling involved
At present I getting great results with SV Decon 1.8 equal or better than this BlurXterminator thing and it usually takes me 5 or 6 mins
Spatially Variant PSF Deconvolution is performed as normal whilst tracking your data, true high fidelity signal processing ( it’s not an add on later )
https://www.startools.org/modules/sv-decon
Cheers
Martin