Quote:
Originally Posted by marc4darkskies
Yeah, that looks pretty convincing, as does the darker sky.  I know nothing about astroart, but a quick browse of astroart 8 seems to show a tool displaying FWHM  . I'd encourage anyone wanting to quantify their seeing conditions to quote FWHM. These days I quote average FWHM in arcsecs for each image I post. |
Thanks to your inquiry Marcus
Courtesy of Allan (alpal) and using MaximDL processing software to analyse the FWHM of multiple stars across the raw Fits Luminance frames, used in this image, confirms an average FWHM of 1.7" with some figures as low as 1.644" which is pretty good and I have seen similarly sharp sub frames on all four imaging sessions done at Eagleview so far...so, fingers crossed, this proves common place up there!
Mike