Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonius
I agree, Alex, if your model predicts something like dark matter, then you look for experimental evidence supporting that prediction and fail, the model should be falsified, pending new evidence.
At this point I think there is something wrong with our fundamental understanding of gravity, rather than an undetectable darkmatter.
|
Thank you for your post Markus.
The biggest critism of the fundamental " push gravity" approach which translates into gravity being a universal pressure is that " they" can't find the "particles" yet ironically there have been many mines housing cleaning fluid to catch dark matter...not sure if they have found many yet.
I wish I had the inclination and the ability to write a computer program to replicate what must occur in reality which is that at any point..any point..there is a little piece of the universe passing thru that point at C presumably ( make a list)..and for every point in the universe...an easy way to contemplate the reality that I "see" is to imagine a single point and make it the centre of a ten billion light year sphere.larger or smaller will make little difference..now imagine how many trajectories thru that point..near infinite would be a reasonably good guess from a geometric point of view...however then think how many "particles" or energies travel along each trajectory and then ask would this not create the gravity pressure I suspect? But in such a program I feel that one could place a galaxy and observe the rotation curves... I can imagine it and I just know that program would demonstrate that dark matter is not real.
I like putting lens in this environment (You can draw this in two dimentions to get the point) and asking which way the light will bend on the basis the "fat" part of the glass shields to produce a slight imbalance on either side of this pressure and where the light will then need to travel the lens restricting the flow more on one side than the other.
If you are able to do both the things I suggest you can get an insite into how it all works...
The main thing is to think about how it must work and finally that reduces to the system I suggest...but hey I am only a mug so it is just speculation..I never invest so heavily in an idea that I will insist that I can only be right..but what makes me think I am on the right track is we take for granted a force we call attraction exists but when you think about it there is no way each object can have such a relationship with everything else...the pressure idea is simple and avoids unestablished forces such as attraction.
I hope you and yours are all doing well.
Alex