View Single Post
  #13  
Old 19-10-2022, 03:19 PM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,246
Hi all,

Quote:
Originally Posted by oska View Post
Are you using whatever the equivalent of "Star HFR method" and "Hyperbolic curve fitting strategy"?
Ekos uses HFR (Half Flux Radius) and offers multiple ways of getting there - Polynomial, Iterative, and at least 2 others. The documentation on indilib.org seems to be out of date on this.

I'll have a look at what I'm using when I get a chance, but it worked pretty well on Monday night when I was imaging 47Tuc. The stars in the final image look good - perhaps a little blurred - which some tuning of Ekos should resolve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodon
Can a light leak give you that effect in the pic you posted? Like I mentioned my focusor did on my ED72.
Maybe. Although I'm not certain it's a light leak - there is only about 5mm of focuser tube exposed and all the fittings are screwed together. (M54-M54 adapter / SW flattener / M48-M42 spacer / M42 spacer / M42 spacer / camera)

I suspect that what I'm seeing as vignetting is an artifact of a hyper-aggressive asinh-stretch operation. Why do I say this? I went back and restacked the NGC290 data with flats, darks, bias and lights and got out a much better looking image after a gentle asinh-stretch.

Similarly, the 47Tuc image stack came out quite clean using the same method.

Cheers,
V
Reply With Quote