|
Hi Scott,
Between the two, you can cover everything from wide-angle Milky Way shots to larger DSO (Deep Space Objects) and some of the larger galaxies.
However, without a tracking mount, I suggest sticking to the wider angle shots; simply to reduce the amount of star trailing. (The 500 Rule is handy here to compute the longest exposure you can do without starting to see smudged stars.)
Have a look on YouTube for Nico Carver (NebulaPhotos) to see what can be achieved with a camera on a tripod - you'd be surprised at what you can do.
With regards to a tripod, go for something sturdy with a bit of weight in it. I have a Manfrotto 290 (something or other) and whilst not cheap, it has some heft to it.
If you decide astro is for you, then a small tracker such as a Star Adventurer or Sky Guider is a good step up. I'll go out on a limb and suggest the Star Adventurer GTi - controlled by your phone and with full GoTo capabilities. They're brand new and not quite out on the market, so be prepared to wait a while if you're keen.
Failing that, haunt the 'For Sale' section here, as mounts do come up on a regular basis.
Oh, and astrobuysell.com is another option, too.
Cheers,
V
|