View Single Post
  #8  
Old 11-10-2006, 09:33 AM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Suchting
I wouldn't say `kill' but SCT's usually suffer from rough optical surfaces and the 40% obstruction at the secondary baffle lowers image contrast significantly over the smaller Newt obstruction. A 33% obstruction for example lowers the contrast curves equivelent to an unobstructed system with about 1/2 wave wavefront error. Throw in some surface roughness , and real optical errors and even good SCT's are struggling to get a Strehl ration in the low 0.70's. A well made Newtonian with small obstruction and single smooth primary surface can easily keep a Strehl above 0.95 ( Strehl ratio of a perfect system is 1.0).

Mark
So out of curiosity, what kind of difference would this difference in Strehl ratio translate in terms of difference in observable magnitude? Another way of asking is, for a visual observer what difference might a "reasonably skilled" observer notice?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote