Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkArts
That's entirely subjective, and I strongly disagree.  |
Definitely subjective.
Quote:
|
Sony were never involved - they're just a consumer.
|
This doesn't really mean anything. Sony take the panel and make a (IMO, and others) better picture out of it than LG does. I know that's subjective, but there's a reason the X90J tops the picture quality tests at Rtings.
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/be...ndation_238978
LG usually takes the best all-rounder awards because they add a lot of great features, Sony takes the best picture quality.
same here:
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/best/by-size/65-inch
LG best all round. Sony best picture quality.
Quote:
|
You can admire whatever features Sony builds in to their TVs that's separate from the display (it depends on what you prefer), but picture quality won't be superior.
|
This is the part that's not subjective. You absolutely can improve picture quality from panel to panel and brand to brand. The determination of which one is better is the subjective part. The added features are a personal choice. I went with Panasonic even though they had a rubbish interface compared to LG at the time (I think LG was using an early version of WebOS) because Panasonic hands down had better picture quality even if the interface was (and is) awful.
Anywho, will leave it there, otherwise these threads turn into vs ones, which isn't fun.
Buy what's in your budget (or not!) and what looks good for you and ticks your boxes.