Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Here's a very good image in broadband of the same subject with very similar gear although slightly bigger aperture. You can see the expected level of details.
If you want to compare your fine details with a good reference the HST widefield in narrowband is the one to check and you'll see what I am talking about.
I have imaged this target extensively over the years at various FL so yeah I do know that region inside out.
The only opinion I presented is that you should reprocess. The rest is just plain facts. No need for a blog. IIS posts are on the record for everyone to see and learn or discuss.
|
again, what part of 'this is art' is lost on you? srsly. lol. i see some of the subtlety's of how some people use english is lost. i apologise.
also, how is comparing an image taken by a billion dollar space telescope with no atmospheric diffraction to an amateur astro setup with no adaptive optics in any way a comparable measure? lol