Quote:
Originally Posted by Addos
thanks guy, but what part of "some artistic licence was taken" lends itself to "this image is 100% scientifically accurate". lol
i like that you offered some specific ideas about how to approach aggressive sharpening, and even offered an example of where you've imaged this target at this fov and demonstrated what it 'should' look like. quality.
i would be keen to read more of your opinions in blog format. can you link me the address?
|
Here's a very good image in broadband of the same subject with very similar gear although slightly bigger aperture. You can see the expected level of details.
https://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/...d.php?t=198036
If you want to compare your fine details with a good reference the HST widefield in narrowband is the one to check and you'll see what I am talking about.
I have imaged this target extensively over the years at various FL so yeah I do know that region inside out.
The only opinion I presented is that you should reprocess. The rest is just plain facts. No need for a blog. IIS posts are on the record for everyone to see and learn or discuss.