Quote:
Originally Posted by Culford
I am fairly certain this topic has been covered before; here it is...
What do you think, believe or know to be the best scenario?
Scenario 1, Top of the range eyepieces and a "good" telescope.
Or
Scenario 2, Top of the range telescope and "good" eyepieces.
|
Apart from a brief ownership of a Vixen 102mm and a WO 66mm Refractor all my other scopes (Mewlon 250, FSQ-106N, FSQ-106ED, TEC160FL, AP130GTX, APOMAX 130mm, OOUK VX250) have/are Top End. The only 'Good' eyepieces I have used are the Fujiyama's and the Parks. Other than these my other eyepieces have been Televue, Takahashi, Zeiss, TMB's. My view is the best scenario is Top of the range telescope and "good" eyepieces. Its like putting a standard DVD into a BluRay Player .. the Top End scope will up scale the eyepiece. A 'Top Range' eyepiece will not drastically improve a 'Good' scope.