View Single Post
  #18  
Old 26-09-2021, 01:35 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059 View Post
Cool shots Marc.
Thanks Peter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by N1 View Post
Good to know the C14 works well at UV. I'll try our club's again when conditions are better.

When I had the 120MM on the 8" dob, I thought the SNR wasn't too bad actually. Image scale was the problem there, and to a degree, seeing. I'll have a 8" GSO CC here soon so will see what that might yield. Sick of doing hand tracked vids with the dob...
Actually I have a 8.5" TAK CC and I would love to start pushing a big dob.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
That's an interesting comment about AR coated windows...
I use the ASI 178 with the MiniSHG and have imaged in the CaK with no problems.
I should remove the window and see if the difference is measurable with the spectrograph.
Excellent. It'll be interesting to see the results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
The ZWO data shows a 15% QE at 300nm which doesn't seem to match an issue with the coated window.
https://astronomy-imaging-camera.com.../asi178mm-mono
ZWO also push to use a UV-IR filter on colour camera with AR coated windows??!!
https://astronomy-imaging-camera.com...-ir-cut-filter
This infers to me that the AR coating is not equivalent to a UV reject coating.
I have a graph from C. Pellier that was sent to me recently about the AR window cut in the lower part of the spectrum. It's on my other PC. I'll post it.
Reply With Quote