Quote:
Originally Posted by blindman
Do you stil believe in that?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by julianh72
Do you have a better theory of why two distinctly different dinosaur skeletons (one medium-sized predator, and one much larger herbivore) were found intertwined at the same location (which is a very rare find)?
I think it's a better theory than that the two skeletons (Banjo and Matilda) were two big lizards who unfortunately got washed away in a 40-day deluge brought about by a vengeful god, just before they could get to the safety of Noah's Ark.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJL
Uhhhh what else is the option?
Edit: Oh I just saw your signature. Unless you’re making a joke, you should look up what “theory” means in science. It’s not what you think and it’s very different to how the word is used in ordinary lexicon |
We're not going down that route of discussion here.
Take it to pm's if need be.
The only reason I've not deleted the posts is to serve as a warning.
Thanks and now back on topic, please.
RB