Quote:
Originally Posted by kosborn
Looks good! I'm surprised how few examples of this target there are (which makes it a good target to choose). I'm in the middle of acquiring the same object using an ASI2600mc and an f/5 Newtonian. I have 4 hours so far and it's still very noisy so I guess it's a target that needs lots of time to do it justice.
|
Thanks. Good luck with your image. Yes, it is quite faint. I tried it a few years ago from the suburbs and gave up! I'd wanted more dark sky data than I got as with under 9 hours total it is still noisy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJL
That doesn't look good, it looks fantastic. What a stunning shot, so much depth.
Thank you for sharing 
|
Thanks Adam.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
The field and res looks real good Paul. 
To answer why it is not often imaged I reckon because it's hard to image. It's far too faint. Especially at that FL too. Although it's still noisy I'm surprised you've got that much for the integration time.
|
Thanks Marc. Yes agreed - it is a tricky sucker!
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Lovely image Paul.
Greg.
|
Thanks Greg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Placidus
A superb interpretation. The colour is particularly fine. Ok, so is the contrast, and the detail.
I once had a go, a million years ago, and made a mess. You've said the magic words, "Reflection nebula". We'll have another go in Spring.
Mike
|
Very kind, Mike. I will be sure to try to add some more data to it myself in the spring too.