View Single Post
  #5  
Old 20-09-2006, 02:29 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,820
Hi Dave and welcome.

Very crudely, you will probably find that astro-imaging can be classified into a few major groups:
  1. Individual DSO’s (Deep Sky Objects). e.g. galaxies, clusters, nebulae, etc. as the dominant subject matter.
  2. Wide field. As above but in a wider field – a pretty setting where the object is generally not dominant (not including the large area nebulae, etc).
  3. Lunar and Planetary (high resolution)
  4. Lunar and Planetary (wider, pretty pictures).
The 80mm is probably more optimised for 2 and 4 which IMO do not require a barlow.

1 and 3 require more aperture.
1 requires a solid, accurate (= expensive) mount for tracking and auto-guiding purposes.

Based upon the above, I would probably not recommend spending money on a Barlow at this stage, as this places far too great a demand on the mount (long exposures required) and allied skills such as finding objects, focusing, etc.

Anyhow, that’s a brief brain dump to try and cover what I think may be some main topics for consideration.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote